The George Zimmerman Verdict

On February 26, 2012 there was a shooting in Sanford, Florida. George Zimmerman tool Trayvon Martin, a 17 year-old black boy. Zimmerman was the part watchman at the time. Zimmerman saw Martin in the neighborhood and thought he looked laughable therefore he called 911. after the dispatch call cease Zimmerman and Martin got into a violent affray which led to Zimmerman shooting Martin. This matter attracted all the media attention. Due to a worldly concern demand Zimmerman was arrested on April 11, 2012. It was a very enthusiastic trial that motivated the human race to get involved. On July 13, 2013 Zimmerman was implant non guilty for the final stage of Trayvon Martin. This case received a huge outburst from the public due to the different opinions regarding the finding of fact. An analytic thinking of the multiple editorials written somewhat the verdict shows two hale sides: one supporting the verdict and one opposing it.\n superstar advocate of the verdict is Brian T annebaum, a criminal defense attorney in Florida. Tannebaum urges the public to find the equity before they drumhead it. He argues, The jury didnt withdraw Zimmerman because they thought he was a good guy or because they werent sad that a vernal boy was killedthey found him not guilty because the facts and the law essential them to do so (Tannebaum). Tannebaums point is that the public must base their verdict on the evidence given and the Florida laws alternatively than emotion. He believes that it is important to book\njustice and follow the laws, whatever they might be. He states, You pass on a problem with that, do something to change the law other than complain on fond media (Tannebaum). Tannebaum sends a message to the great unwashed that are unhappy with the verdict. He feels that people should take a stand and do something active the law instead of complain about it on complaisant media. Tannebaum does not condone Zimmermans actions but agrees with the verdic t because the law defends Zimmerman.\nAnother su...