Critical Thinking Application Paper

Thinking Critically semblance Review
University of Phoenix
MGT
350












Thinking Critically Simulation Review
The capers discussed in the simulation were structured in a counsel that allowed easy understanding for the decisions to be made. However, remote of providing the shades for troubleshooting, No other tools seemed to be introduced. The steps for the simulation were
1. Framing the problem
a. name the problem
b. Define criteria, goals, and objectives
c. Evaluate effect of the problem
2. Making the decision
d. Identify reasonableness of the problem
e. Frame alternatives
f. Evaluate impacts of alternatives
g. Make the decision
3. Evaluating the decision
h. Implement decisions
i.



Measure impacts
This was a good method of evaluating a problem, but it leaves room for utility by not using troubleshooting tools such as brainstorming, cause-and-effect (fishbone) diagrams, leave out charts, and benchmarking to name a few. While completing the first step in this method, Framing the problem, the simulation asked for critically thinking outside the box to find the root cause of the problem. Sometimes the problem in front of an individual may not be the root of the problem. For example, in the simulation one of the problems encountered is that the employees were complaining because the compact induced style of one of the floor theatre directors. The floor manager thought that his presser style of managing was justified because his pay was dependent upon the doing of the...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay



If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .