C. Wright Mills Writings

He pointed out that apply dignified and righteous direct action also has the emergence of negating many of the forefingerful tools available to the elite (such as force out and legal chicanery).

Malcolm X has been viewed as the only true couple to Dr. King for black political and social leadership in the 1960s. In the excerpts taken from The Autobiography of Malcolm X (1964), Malcolm X make it very clear that he agreed with Mills that elites adjudge the wealth and political power of this nation. However, Malcolm X believed the question of power in the United States really boils down to a racial impinge between smocks and nonwhites. Unlike Martin Luther King jr., he believed blacks should non rule out any means of attaining self-importance dominance and self protection from the elites (whites). Interestingly, Malcolm X defends his advocacy of violence (if necessary) by arguing that King's nonviolent methods would make no gains from an enemy whose mad constitution did not allow him to perceive nonwhites as summa cum laude of consideration as dignified or even homophile (Malcolm X, 1964, 92).

The Port Huron Statement (1962), by Tom Hayden, was a legal brief treatise which supported C. Wright Mills' notions of a powerful elite dominating American Society. Written just before the civilian Rights and antiVietnam movements had rea

Hayden, T. (1962). The Port Huron Statement.

Malcolm X argued that the black rabble did not want integration with whites but rather selfdetermination. For him this was a very important difference between his school of thought and King's. He actually believed that the nonviolent integrationists were doing a serious ill turn to the cause of blacks because it allowed whites in the elite power structure mark over the movement and thus the ability to weaken its resolve, its tactics, and its goals. He argued that whites always acted as if they had benevolent notions toward blacks until those blacks spoke out concerning their passion for equal rights and opportunities as well as their resentment toward the white powersthatbe (Malcolm X, 1964, 93).

Whenever this positioning occurred, whites, at their best, turned their backs on blacks and at worst turned on blacks.

This analysis will comparing the works of the four authors who generally agreed that their was a class conflict occurring in America. However, there are some differences in how each characterized that conflict and even bullyer differences in how that conflict should be resolved.

C. Wright Mills died in 1962 before the Civil Rights dejection reached its zenith. Had he lived, it would behave been fascinating to see if the social movements of the 60s would have altered his philosophy regarding the elite power structure in any way. Similarly, Malcolm X was assassinated in 1966 and Martin Luther King Jr. in 1968. In this modern era where many of the tenets of the Civil Rights movement are under attack as we depend to retreat from them, it would have been interesting to see what these men verbalise and did. One cannot help but feel that this sad situation concerning American racial issues would not be occurring had those two great men have survived.

Finally, he called for a change in our philosophy regarding the uses of economics. Based on the idea that all existence have important worth, economics would involve
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.